Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Salafi’

He is a Surooree – Shaykh Muqbil (rahimahullaah)

Scholar: ´Allâmah Muqbil bin Hâdî al-Wâdi´î
Source: http://www.salafishare.com/26R2KKDH0GSU/0LD6DJV.wav
Reference: Darulhadith.com
http://www.aFatwa.com

Question: There is a person who calls himself as ”Salafî”. Even so, he says that the scholars of the Salafiyyûn today are ignorant. He says that they do not possess any knowledge other than Fiqh-related issues and that they favour the rulers.

He says that the rulers are disbelievers. He considers it as being allowed with several groups and cooperates with them. Is this a Salafî?

Shaykh Muqbil: This is a Surûrî.

Related Links:

The Deviant Speech of Abu Adnan from Sydney on Protests/Demonstrations

Video Courtesy: SalafiDawahNZ

This individual has many oppositions to the Salafi manhaj. His dodgy website has a section entitled “recommended links” and the only link is to the kalamullah website which is full of takfeeri material.

Related Links:

Umar Al-Ashqar and Others From The Ikwhanul Muslimeen [Audio|En]

February 17, 2013 Leave a comment


ahlulsunnahwaljammah

[Download Mp3 Audio Here]

Q&A Concerning Modern-Day Callers & Groups and The Tricks they Employ
By Abu Hakeem Bilaal Davis & Abu Khadeejah Abdul-Waahid

An important Q&A session from the Seminar ‘Holding on to Islaam in Times of Fitnah’ (Oct ’08, Toronto, Canada). Our good brothers, Abu Hakeem and Abu Khadeejah address some questions concerning some of the groups and personalities of the day who clothe themselves with the garments of Ahlus-Sunnah, as-Salafiyyeen whilst cooperating with Ahlul-Bid’ah. Important questions are posed concerning Yaasir Qadhee, Abu Usaamah and the al-Maghrib institute.

[Q5]: What is the position of ‘Umar al-Ashqar?

[Q6]: Concerning the splinter groups of the ‘Ikhwaanul-Muslimoon’ (from the most political to the most violent) and the widespread destruction of this movement

Refuting Yusuf al Qaradhawi: “If Allaah was a candidate He would not have been able to take this amount”

January 26, 2013 2 comments

Bismillahirrahmaanirraheem!

Assalaamuaalaikum wa rahmathullahi wa barakaathuhu!

The following content is taken from SalafiPublications
This was what Qradawi said few years from now.


Some reliable students of knowledge had informed us that they had heard directly from a cassette the saying of al-Qaradawi, the ignorant and evil Muftee, that if Allaah had partaken in elections (i.e. became a candidate) he would not have won with such a victory that Netanyahu had won in Israel, since the latter took 99% of the votes.

The actual text of his (Qaradawi’s) words are as follows (in the second part of a Friday khutbah),

“Before I leave this station of mine (i.e. from giving this khutbah) I love that I should say a word about the results of the Israeli elections. The Arabs, all of them, were placing their hopes in the victory of Barleen, however he lost and this is what we praise about Israel. We desire and hope that our country can be like this country. Due to only a small number of people, the one who was actually ruling lost his position. There was not 94% or 95% (of votes) which is what we are accustomed to in our country, but 99%, (yes) 99%. If Allaah had presented himself to the people as a candidate he would not have been able to take this amount… we welcome Israel for what it has accomplished…” 

Corroborating this is Shaikh Muqbil bin Haadee, who stated in his refutation of the Wicked Muftee in the book “Silencing the Hounding Dog”,

“On this day I was informed by the brother, Saalih al-Bakri that he heard some words of (al-Qaradawi) in a cassette that he says that this Jew (i.e. the Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu) was victorious by 99% of votes and that Allaah cannot even achieve this, even if the people voted for Allaah, He would not be able to acquire 99% of the votes. These words are clear and manifest misguidance. If he wished to make a Jew superior to Allaah, free is He from imperfection, the Most High, then he is a disbeliever (i.e. apostate). And if he intended that the Jews and Christians and the worshippers of the cow and chickens and others are very many in number yet they do not vote for Allaah, then this is another matter, however it is still clear misguidance (on al-Qaradawi’s behalf). 

For verily our Lord, the Mighty and Majestic, is not in need of voting, for He, free is He of all imperfection is the one who says “Be” to something and it is. He is the one who destroyed Fir’aun, and He destroyed Qaarun, and He destroyed many nations, from amongst those who exceeded beyond bounds and who stood in the faces of the Prophets of Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic. So he aided the Prophets and gave them victory, in this life and the next. 

Voting is only needed by a weak man, O Pauper!…. Have you disbelieved O Qaradawi or have you brought yourself nearer?…And after that this Aqeel al-Maqtari comes along, may Allaah not bless him, and he honoured and welcomed Yusuf al-Qaradawi, just as he honoured and welcomed Muhammad Suroor… ”

(Silencing the Hounding Dog, pp.110-112).

Stated Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen after these words were played to him,

“I seek refuge in Allaah. It is obligatory for this person to repent. And if he does not he should be killed as an apostate, since he made the creation more knowledgeable than the Creator. It is upon him to repent to Allaah, so if he repents, then Allaah forgives the sins of His servants. And if not then the Wullaat ul-Amr should strike his neck (with the sword).”

(Cassette Recording, quoted in Silencing the Hounding Dog, p.119).

Sourcehttp://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=796

Now watch the Video :


[Alternative Video Link]

Read the Related discussion Here

[Must Watch] Muhammed Al Arifi Surah Tu’faaha Mockery Addressed By Shaykh Ubayd & Shaykh Al Fawzaan

November 17, 2012 Leave a comment

Note : Muhammad Al-’Areefi is the author of the popular book “Enjoy Your Life!

Video Courtesy: MuslimVlogGuy

Related Links:

Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmî about al-’Arifi: “It is not allowed to listen to storytellers”

November 17, 2012 Leave a comment

Scholar: ´Allâmah Ahmad bin Yahyâ an-Najmî
Source: http://z-salafi.com/v2/zsalafi.php?s_menu=23&idFatwa=1213
Reference: Darulhadith.com
http://aFatwa.com

Question: Is it allowed to listen to Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdir-Rahmân al-’Urayfî?

Shaykh an-Najmî: It is not allowed to listen to storytellers. It makes the humans gather around them, which is inappropriate.

Related Links :

about Muhammad al-’Arifi’s view of the injustice of the leader | Shaykh al-Fawzân

November 17, 2012 Leave a comment

Note : Muhammad Al-’Areefi is the author of the popular book “Enjoy Your Life!

Scholar: ´Allâmah Sâlih bin Fawzân al-Fawzân
Source: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=128956
Reference: Darulhadith.com
Audio and Translation courtesy of http://aFatwa.com

What was said by al-’Arifi:

Host: How do we combine between the command of the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) to hear and obey the leader even if he were to flog your back and take your property(1) and what the people are doing today?

al-’Arifi: “There is of course a difference if the ruler attacks one individual. Muslim reports that the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said:

“Hear and obey even if he were to flog your back and take your property.”

This is regarding if the ruler attacks one individual that he has a problem with. Otherwise the ruler is good. But in this case he comes to one person and flogs his back and takes his property. It should be said to this person not to rise up and incite towards rebellion or make armed rebellion against him. For the disadvantage of this deed is greater than him having flogged you. Look whether you can take your money from him in a different way. What we are speaking of is if the ruler takes money from the entire population.

1: “…You should hear and obey the ruler, even if he flogs your back and takes your wealth, then still hear and obey.”" [Reported by Muslim (Eng. trans. 3/1029/no.4554).]

Shaykh al-Fawzân’s statement regarding this explanation of the Hadîth:

Question: What do you say about the one who says that the Hadîth [regarding that one should] hear and obey if one were to be flogged only applies to the just ruler who attacks one individual….

Shaykh al-Fawzân: That is his own understanding. I have heard him myself. It is his own understanding. He should not explain the speech of the messenger (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) in that way. This person follows his desire and wants to interpret the words of the messenger in accordance with his desire and lust. It is not allowed. He puts words into the messenger’s (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) mouth. It is very dangerous.

Related Links:

Shaykh Muhammad bin Hâdî al-Madkhalî on Muhammad Al-’Areefi (Author of the popular book “Enjoy Your Life!”)

November 17, 2012 Leave a comment

Note : Muhammad Al-’Areefi is the author of the popular book “Enjoy Your Life!

Scholar: Shaykh Muhammad bin Hâdî al-Madkhalî
Source: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=129153
Reference: Darulhadith.com
http://aFatwa.com

What was said by al-’Arifi (or al-’Urayfî):

Host: How do we combine between the command of the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) to hear and obey the leader even if he flogs your back and takes your property(1) and what the people are doing today?

al-’Arifi: “There is of course a difference if the ruler attacks one individual. Muslim reports that the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said:

“Hear and obey even if he flogs your back and takes your property.”

This is regarding if the ruler attacks one individual that he has a problem with. Otherwise the ruler is good. But in this case he comes to one person and flogs his back and takes his property. It should be said to this person not to rise up and incite towards rebellion or rebel with armor against him. For the disadvantage of this deed is greater than him having flogged you. Look whether you can take your money from him in a different way. What we are speaking of is if the ruler takes money from the entire population.

1: “…You should hear and obey the ruler, even if he flogs your back and takes your wealth, then still hear and obey.”" [Reported by Muslim (Eng. trans. 3/1029/no.4554).]

Shaykh Muhammad al-Madkhalî:

Question: [the beginning of the question is missing]: … ["Hear and obey even if he flogs your back] and takes your property.” is specific and how should one advise the people in these conditions?

Shaykh Muhammad bin Hâdî al-Madkhalî: I know who this person is. I have heard him say this. He lies about Allâh and His messenger (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam). He is ignorant and follows his desire. He should be ignored. Allâh’s messenger’s (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) multiple Hadiths all say that it is obligatory to hear and obey the leaders of the Muslims even if they are unjust. That is how those who believe and [those who] know the Sunnah of Allâh’s messenger (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) speak. He (‘alayhi salâtu wa salâm) ordered us to hear and obey them. The clearest [evidence] that refutes this ignorant liar who follows his desire are the words of the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) when it was said to him:

“O messenger of Allâh! What should we do if we are ruled by leaders who ask of us their right — that is, to hear and obey — and hinder us from our right?”

He answered:

“Give them their right and ask Allâh for your right.”

It was said to the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam):

“Should we not fight them?”

He answered:

“No, not as long as they are performing the prayer amongst you.”

Imâm Ahmad (rahimahullâh) discussed with the scholars in Bagdad during al-Ma’mûn’s, al-Mu’tasim’s and al-Wâthiq’s dynasties. He discussed with them regarding rebelling against them when they started to try the people with the creation of the Qur’ân [I.e. this false belief of Kufr that the Qur'ân is created]. When they said that they would neither hear nor obey them [these rulers], he said to them:

“It contradicts the reports that say that one should not do it as long as they pray. Fear Allâh and do not spill the blood of the Muslims.”

He laid great importance on the lives of the Muslims. He discouraged them and clarified for them the correct understanding in the matter.

There is no doubt that these deviate from that which was followed by Allâh’s messenger’s (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) companions, the followers and the Imâms who followed them in a correct way. His statement is a false statement. Knowledge is not taken from him.

We are pleased that great scholars refute these astray people such as this person and his likes. An example of them is Muftî ['Abdul-'Azîz Âl ash-Shaykh], may Allâh reward him well, and the noble Shaykh and ‘Allâmah Sâlih bin Fawzân al-Fawzân. They have refuted him and clarified his ignorance and all praise is due to Allâh.

Shaykh Muqbil about ‘Abdullâh ‘Azzâm and his books

September 16, 2012 Leave a comment

Scholar: ´Allâmah Muqbil bin Hâdî al-Wâdi´î
Source: http://muqbel.net/sounds.php?sound_id=4
1418-10-12/1998-02-09
Reference: Darulhadith.com
http//aFatwa.com

Shaykh Muqbil: As for the statement:

“The one whose teacher is the book will have more wrongs than rights”,

it applies if he does not choose a good book. An example of that is that he buys Abûl-Layth as-Samarqandî’s “Tanbîh-ul-Ghâfilîn” or “Rawdh-ul-Fâ’iq fîr-Raqâ’iq”. The same is true if he were to buy books that are written by Sa’îd Hawwâ or Hizbiyyûn such as
‘Abdullâh ‘Azzâm and others.

If one does not choose a good book, then it is true that one’s wrongs will be more than (one’s) rights. However, if he were to make the right choice of book, then he has to have more rights than wrongs.

Ibn ‘Uthaymîn about the cassette tapes of Safar al-Hawâlî and Salmân al-’Awdah

September 16, 2012 1 comment

Scholar: Imâm Muhammad bin Sâlih bin ´Uthaymîn
Source: salafishare.com/268L3MS6UATM/DIMJUTO.wav
Reference: Darulhadith.com
Audio and translation courtesy of http://www.aFatwa.com

From a phonecall with the Shaykh (rahimahullâh):

Question: They listen to the cassette tapes of Safar al-Hawâlî and Salmân al-’Awdah. Should we advise them not to listen to them? Can we listen to Safar al-Hawâlî and Salmân al-’Awdah?

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymîn: The good that is in their cassette tapes is already found in other. There are some observations in some of their cassette tapes, not all of them, and I am not able to distinguish between this and that in them for you.

Questioner: So you advise us not to listen to their cassette tapes?

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymîn: No [don't]. I [rather] advise you to listen to Shaykh Ibn Bâz’s, Shaykh al-Albânî’s and other known scholars’ cassette tapes that are known for uprightness and integrity and not known for revolutionary ideologies.

Questioner: Shaykh! They deem that the rulers are disbelievers, they say that there is Jihâd in Algeria and they listen to Salmân and Safar al-Hawâlî. Is this a dissension in the branches (I.e. Far’î, subsidiary) or in the principles?

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymîn: This is a dissension in the creed (‘Aqîdah). It is from the creed of Ahl-us-Sunnah wal-Jamâ’ah not to declare someone as a disbeliever due to a sin.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,367 other followers