Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Refutation’

He is a Surooree – Shaykh Muqbil (rahimahullaah)

Scholar: ´Allâmah Muqbil bin Hâdî al-Wâdi´î
Source: http://www.salafishare.com/26R2KKDH0GSU/0LD6DJV.wav
Reference: Darulhadith.com
http://www.aFatwa.com

Question: There is a person who calls himself as ”Salafî”. Even so, he says that the scholars of the Salafiyyûn today are ignorant. He says that they do not possess any knowledge other than Fiqh-related issues and that they favour the rulers.

He says that the rulers are disbelievers. He considers it as being allowed with several groups and cooperates with them. Is this a Salafî?

Shaykh Muqbil: This is a Surûrî.

Related Links:

Surûriyyah’s way with the scholars – Shaykh Muqbil (rahimahullaah)

Scholar: ´Allâmah Muqbil bin Hâdî al-Wâdi´î
Source: http://muqbel.net/sounds.php?sound_id=16
Reference: Darulhadith.com
Translation & video: http://aFatwa.com

Shaykh Muqbil:

Surûriyyah, regardless of whether they are in Saudi Arabia or in Yemen, make fun of the scholars and say that they are ignorant. This for instance exists in the magazine as-Sunnah. I praised the magazines “as-Sunnah” and “al-Bayân” in the past, but they make fun of the scholars and say that they do not understand anything from the current affairs unlike the beginners. One of the signs of the Hizbiyyûn is that they make fun of the scholars and avoid their sittings. This pleases the enemies of Islâm and the devils.

The “Yusuf Estes” Version of Paradise

Yusuf Estes: People in Paradise Will Confuse Their Wives with Their Lord

In the Name of Allah, the All-Merciful, the Ever Merciful…

Controversial American preacher, Yusuf Estes, explains another one of his own unique interpretations of Islamic teachings on Huda TV, that a man’s wife in Paradise will be so beautiful and “divine” that he will think she is his Lord and prostrate in front of her. Here are his exact words:

In the Paradise, there will be one who will come in to wherever the man is, and he will see it [his wife], and he will think its God, so beautiful, so divine, that he will literally fall to the ground in front of this wonderul, wonderful thing that he is seeing. Then, it says to him, “Get up! What are you doing? Don’t you know who I am? I was your wife in the earth. On the earth, I was your wife.” What? Yeah.

Source: “Face Islam” on Huda TV (not dated), uploaded to YouTube on Jan. 15, 2013:YouTube / Safeshare

Important Commentary:

This is a baseless lie about the affairs of the Unseen. The detailed affairs of the Hereafter are only known from the revelation given to the Prophets. No one has the right to speak about them however he wishes.

Aside from being a baseless lie, it contradicts the authentic teachings of Islam from a number of angles:

Clarity of View of Allah in the Hereafter

Firstly, one of the basic beliefs in Islam is to believe that the people will see Allah on the Day of Judgment, and the believers in Paradise will enjoy looking at their Majestic Lord as their greatest reward. As the Prophet (may Allah raise his rank and grant him peace) described in detail, believers will see Allah as clearly as we can see the full moon on a clear night. (Bukhari and Muslim)

With this kind of clarity, to believe that someone in Paradise would not know what Allah looks like and thus confuse the Almighty Lord of all that exists with a woman in Paradise is sheer stupidity and shameful ignorance of the affairs of the Hereafter.

Allah is Uniquely and Incomparably Beautiful

Secondly, it further shows a severe weakness in understanding the uniqueness of Allah’s Attributes. Muslims who have taken the time to learn their Religion know that Allah’s Attributes are incomparable to that of His creation. His Beauty is unlike the beauty of the best and most beautiful things He has created. How could any Muslim of intellect believe that people in Paradise who know Allah and enjoy looking at Him all the time could think that a created thing could be comparable to Him or resemble Him in any way?! Absolute foolishness.

Allah is Above His Creation

Thirdly, Allah is above His Creation. He always has been above His creation, and He will always be. He is al-’Aliyy (the Lofty One), al-A’laa (the Most High), above all things. Since He has only described Himself with Loftiness and Highness above His creation, we may not ever consider Him to be within the created realm. Paradise is something Allah created. Allah will be seen by the people of Paradise, yet this does not necessitate that Allah will be inside of Paradise. He is, has always been, and will always be above His Creation. While the deviants of this worldly life seek to confuse people regarding this issue, claiming Allah is “everywhere” or He is “without a place”, the people of Paradise will not be confused in this issue.

Thus, how could a man in Paradise think that Allah is there in front of him, as he comes in to the place described by Yusuf Estes: ”Wherever the man is”? Sadly, Yusuf Estes has expressed in other views that the Quran is “with Allah in Paradise.” [click here] He clearly does not have the basic foundations of Muslim beliefs, to say the least.

Shirk (Polytheism) in Paradise

Fourthly, in the deviant “Yusuf Estes” version of the Hereafter, people will prostrate to their wives, effectively committing shirk (polytheism), worshipping other than Allah (by mistake).

Confusion, Mistakes, and Rebuke in Paradise

Furthermore, Yusuf Estes believes and teaches that Paradise will be a place of severe confusion, grave mistakes, and spousal rebuke. He thinks a man will be confused about the most important matters, like who Allah actually is. A man will be so confused – not knowing his wife from his Lord – that he will actually attempt to worship someone other than His Lord. This confused man will be erroneous and then rebuked by his wife, who says to him, “What are you doing?” We seek refuge with Allah from this distorted version of Paradise introduced by Yusuf Estes.

Shame on the Muslims who Promote and Defend Yusuf Estes!

With no qualifications to teach Islam in the first place, and these kinds of teachings, Muslims need to accept responsibility for the corruption they have been involved in. Promoting and defending Yusuf Estes, someone described by the scholars of Islam as astray, leading others astray, and someone who does not know anything about Islam [click here and here], is an inexcusable act of severe negligence as it relates to our duty of embodying Islamic teachings and conveying them. Instead of explaining away his horrible mistakes, one by one, it is time for the Muslims to wake up and stop promoting a shameless, ignorant liar as a scholar of Islam, or even a qualified preacher for that matter.

Shame on the Muslims who Vilify and Demonize Estes’ Critics!

When faced with these kinds of clarifications, we have witnessed amazing reactions from some of Yusuf Estes’ dedicated followers. Some of them acknowledge the mistakes, but make baseless claims that Yusuf Estes has retracted them. Others defend the horrific violations with all kinds of acrobatic explanations of his intended meanings. Often, those who are working to spread clarity and correct Islamic beliefs in opposition to his deviant teachings are attacked personally, slandered, vilified, and demonized, in the name of “justice” or “defending the oppressed”. The scales of justice have become corrupted when the people who teach the correct beliefs in Islam are demonized, and the people spreading falsehood are pure and untouchable. Allah warns us of such hypocritical behavior in His Book:

الْمُنافِقُونَ وَالْمُنافِقاتُ بَعْضُهُمْ مِنْ بَعْضٍ يَأْمُرُونَ بِالْمُنْكَرِ وَيَنْهَوْنَ عَنِ الْمَعْرُوفِ

The hypocrites, men and women alike, are (allies) of each other. They command evil, and forbid good. [9:67]

وَإِذا قِيلَ لَهُمْ لا تُفْسِدُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ قالُوا إِنَّما نَحْنُ مُصْلِحُونَ أَلا إِنَّهُمْ هُمُ الْمُفْسِدُونَ وَلكِنْ لا يَشْعُرُونَ

And when it is said to them, “Do not spread corruption on earth,” they say, “Verily, we are merely rectifying.” Nay, they are the ones who spread corruption, yet they do not realize it. [2:11-12]

May Allah distance us from hypocrisy and all its manifestations. May He make us those who work to spread clarity and correct beliefs in Islam. May He make us those who reject falsehood and warn others from it.

Take the time to read about the severe violations of basic Muslim beliefs spread by Yusuf Estes on Huda TV and elsewhere. Read the following publication, seeking refuge with Allah from His Anger, and asking His Guidance alone:

Yusuf Estes and the Quran (PDF)

http://yusufestesquran.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/yusuf-estes-and-the-quran-2-0.pdf

Post Courtesy: Moosa Richardson (hafidhahullaah) on his blog http://yusufestesquran.com

Hasan al-Bannâ, the rolemodel of al-Ikhwân al-Muslimûn | Shaykh al-Albânî [Video|Ar-En Subtitles]

Scholar: Imâm Muhammad Nâsir-ud-Dîn al-Albânî
Source: Silsilat-ul-Hudâ wan-Nûr (200)
Reference: Maktabah Darulhadith, Sweden.
http://aFatwa.com

Shaykh al-Albânî: You see how some people have an extreme attitude towards Hasan al-Bannâ. This extremism obviously does not spring from knowledge. It springs from condemned Hizbiyyah. You see how great leaders from al-Ikhwân al-Muslimûn cut the ties from the messenger (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam). They instead tie them to Hasan al-Bannâ. This is clear. An example of it is the person who shortens his beard after having had a beautiful beard. Whom does he imitate? Hasan al-Bannâ? No. Hasan al-Bannâ had an even more shorter beard. That is why you see practicing al-Ikhwân al-Muslimûn who do not want to shave, [and you see them] grow a short beard and dress in ties so that they become a copy of Hasan al-Bannâ. What happened to complying with the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam)? Our Lord said about him:

“Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.”

(The Qur’ân 33:21, interpretation of the meanings)

That is why they have no knowledge of the life of the messenger. They have cut their ties from the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) because they do not study the Sunnah. They instead busy themselves with politics, gatherings, and economy.

Abdul Majeed al-Zindani, just a misled pharmacist – Shaykh Muqbil [Video|Ar-En Subtitles]

Scholar: ´Allâmah Muqbil bin Hâdî al-Wâdi´î
Source: http://muqbel.net/sounds.php?sound_id=28
Reference: Darulhadith.com
Translation & video: http://aFatwa.com

Shaykh Muqbil: I challenge ‘Abdul-Majîd az-Zindânî to come with one single student who has graduated with him. But the one who does not have anything can’t give anything. Do you know what ‘Abdul-Majîd az-Zindânî knows? He is a pharmacist. He knows if the human has reached the heaven and space. He moreover says that Sudân is an Islâmic country having no equal and similar deceptions. He is astray, leads others astray and deceives. Let the present narrate to the absent.

Related Links:

al-Albânî about Qutb’s rhetorical expressions [Video|Ar-En Subtitles]

Scholar: Imâm Muhammad Nâsir-ud-Dîn al-Albânî
Source: alalbany.net/fatawa_view.php?id=6822
Reference: Maktabah Darulhadith.com, Sweden
http://aFatwa.com

Question:

The author of ”Dhilâl-ul-Qur’ân” says in the beginning of his explanation of the chapter Tâ Hâ”:

“The Qur’ân was a phenomenon such as the phenomenon of the heavens and the earth.”

What do you say of this?

Shaykh al-Albânî:

We have several times, O brother, said that Sayyid Qutb (rahimahullâh) was not learned. He was only an author. He did not manage to express himself about Islâmic beliefs and especially the beliefs of Salafiyyah. That is why we should not talk so much about his words since he was not the type of knowledgeable we are talking about, namely in the Qur’ân, Sunnah and the methodology of the Salaf. Many of the times he expresses himself, he does it in a phraseological and rhetorical way. He namely does not express himself in a knowledge-based and Salafî-based way at all.

We do not hesitate in condemning this expression and this comparison [I.e. that the Qur’ân is a phenomenon as the phenomenon of the heavens and the earth]. The best of can say of it is that he means that it really is the speech of Allâh, which is the opinion of Ahl-us-Sunnah wal-Jamâ’ah, or that it is the metaphorical speech of Allâh, which is the opinion of the Mu’tazilah. Thus, it is poetical speech.

I deem that one should not lay any significant stress on this. What one should do is merely show that it is prohibited to speak in this way and that the author’s view of the Qur’ân is unclear; is it the real speech of Allâh or not. This is what I deem.

To compare an-Nawawî and Ibn Hajar with Sayyid Qutb? – Shaykh an-Najmî [Video|Ar-En Subtitles]

Scholar: ´Allâmah Ahmad bin Yahyâ an-Najmî
Reference & source: Darulhadith.com
Translation & video: http://aFatwa.com

Question: If one warns against the books of Sayyid Qutb, some say that even an-Nawawî and Ibn Hajar had errors.

Shaykh an-Najmî:

Is he and Ibn Hajar and an-Nawawi equal? No! These, such as Ibn Hajar and an-Nawawî, belong to AHL-UL-HADÎTH who erred in a certain aspect. They wrongly interpreted the attributes of Allâh.

As for Sayyid Qutb, then what should one say when only ‘Abdullâh ad-Duwaysh has found 181 errors in his Qur’an-interpretation? Plus his errors in “al-’Adâlah al-Ijtimâ’iyyah” and other books.

I’m An Ash’ari Sunni Sufi Following One Of The 4 Madhabs – Feat. Hamza Yusuf,Nuh Haa Meem Keller, Muhammad al-Yaqoubi [Video|En]

Video Courtesy: MuslimVlogGuy

Related Links:

Shaykh al-Fawzân about Salmân al-´Awdah and the “Youth rising forum”

Scholar: ´Allâmah Sâlih bin Fawzân al-Fawzân
Source: alsaha.com/sahat/3/topics/302873
Reference: Darulhadith.com
Reference to Youth rising forum: multqa-alnhdhah.com/
Reference to the administration: multqa-alnhdhah.com/orginizers.php

http://aFatwa.com

Question: A conference took place these days by the name “Youth rising forum” and has been organised by people that are…

Shaykh al-Fawzân: It has been suspended and refuted and its falsehood has been clarified. It has become infamous and been exposed amongst the people. There is no benefit in asking about it.

Question: When the preacher in our mosque was about to warn against the “Youth rising forum”, he mentioned the leader of that event and warned against him whilst I consider him to be one of the prominent callers. What do you say about that?

Shaykh: That is your opinion. That is your opinion. A person who is a leader of a festival of this kind, (a festival) that consists of all of these catastrophes and diseases, should not be recommended. He should not be recommended if he is its leader.

Related Links:

The Mufti of Saudi Arabia about al-’Arifi’s view of the injustice of the leader

Scholar: ´Allâmah ´Abdul-´Azîz bin ´Abdillâh Âl ash-Shaykh
Source: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=129141
Reference: Darulhadith.com

http://aFatwa.com

What was said by al-’Arifi:

Host: How do we combine between the command of the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) to hear and obey the leader even if he flogs your back and takes your property1 and what the people are doing today?al-’Arifi: “There is of course a difference if the ruler attacks one individual. Muslim reports that the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said:

“Hear and obey even if he flogs your back and takes your property.”

This is regarding if the ruler attacks one individual that he has a problem with. Otherwise the ruler is good. But in this case he comes to one person and flogs his back and takes his property. It should be said to this person not to rise up and incite towards rebellion or rebel with armor against him. For the disadvantage of this deed is greater than him having flogged you. Look whether you can take your money from him in a different way. What we are speaking of is if the ruler takes money from the entire population.

1: “…You should hear and obey the ruler, even if he flogs your back and takes your wealth, then still hear and obey.”” [Reported by Muslim (Eng. trans. 3/1029/no.4554).]

The Mufti of Saudi Arabia:

Question: Does the Hadîth of the prophet (sallâ Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam):

“Hear and obey even if he flogs your back and takes your property.”

only apply to individual cases and that it does not apply to the general injustice or does it cover all injustice?

‘Abdul-’Azîz Âl ash-Shaykh: It is general. It is obligatory to obey the ruler even if he is sinful. It is obligatory to obey. Through the obedience, the matters and conditions are managed correctly, even if there were to exist errors. However, this error should be looked at in proportion to the all-encompassing prosperity.

As for rebellion and disobedience against the rulers, then only Allâh knows what tribulation and mess it all leads to. Draw lessons from some Islâmic countries that suffer from revolts and which they call as “The Arab spring”. Just look at the tribulations that have resulted from them!

O brothers! To hear and obey the ruler is a way to reach a stable, secure, safe and good life. Disobedience and discord for the best of the individuals is extremely harmful. We have to hear and obey and believe that we are obliged to hear and obey, strengthen, stand by their side and defend the rulers we have pledged allegiance to in accordance with the Qur’ân and Sunnah and not wish them and our country evil.

Related Links:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,352 other followers