Archive

Archive for the ‘Sayyid Qutb’ Category

Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmee’s Refutation of Ibn Jibreen’s Request Not To Publish A Refutation al-Ikhwaan and Hassan al-Bannaa

[Read or Download PDF Here]

The Shaikh, Ibn Jibreen got involved with the Qutubiyyah such as Salmaan al-Awdah in the Mis’ari affair (the setting up of CDLR). This changed his perceptions towards some of the Innovators such as Sayyid Qutb and Hassan al-Banna, making him think that they were scholars like the scholars of the past, like Ibn Hajr and an-Nawawi and their likes, who were from Ahl us-Sunnah but erred in certain areas. This whole farce (of al-Mis’ari, Doc. Fitnah) was lambasted by Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen who called it a route to evil and mischief and the likes. However, what is important is that the Shaikh’s involvement with these people influenced his outlook.

This led the Shaikh to find fault with Shaikh Rabee’ and his refutations of Sayyid Qutb and the Qutubiyyah – and led him to utter baseless statements against the Shaikh. Rather, the Shaikh opposed what the rest of the scholars, had unanimously agreed upon, which was the praise and commendation for Shaikh Rabee’ in his refutations and expositions of Sayyid Qutb, and also of the Qutubiyyah like Safar and Salman and others who raised the flag of extremist Irjaa’ towards the Mockers of the Messengers, Revilers of the Caliphs, Mukaffirs of the Companions and Utterers of statements of] Kufr and Apostasy. It also led the Shaikh to write letters to other scholars, such as the noble Shaikh, Ahmad bin Yahyaa an-Najmee, asking them not to write books in refutation of Hassan al-Banna and the defunct, bankrupt, brotherhood

The refutation of Shaikh Ahmad bin Yahyaa an-Najmee is the most powerful, and uses some harsh language (bearing in mind that the Shaikh is senior to Ibn Jibreen) in outlining the great injustice of Ibn Jibreen in his accusations.

The book is called “Radd ul-Jawaab ‘alaa Man Talaba Minnee ‘Adam Tab’ al-Kitaab” (The Return of the Reply To The One Who Requested Me Not To Print the Book). This is 40 pages long, in A4. Shaikh Ibn Jibreen had requested from the Shaikh that he does not print his most excellent work entitled “Al-Mawrid al-Adhb az-Zulaal Feemantuqida Alaa Ba’d al-Manaahij ad-Da’awiyyah Min al-’Aqaa’id wal-A’maal” (The Cold Sweet [Flowing] Spring Water [That Quenches (the Thirst)] Concerning What Can Be Criticised Of Beliefs and Actions Of Some of the Methodologies of Da’wah).

This book is a detailed, reference-filled, authoratitive refutation of the overall methodologies of Jamaa’at ut-Tabligh, and Ikhwaan ul-Muflisoon, with details of their history, founders, developments, deviations and many other issues. It also contains an excellent and detailed refutation of Hassan al-Bannaa and Muhammad Ilyaas, and their great deviations and heresies, and who were far astray from the aqeedah of the Salaf. The book is 340 pages in total. So Ibn Jibreen requested the Shaikh not to print this book, as he claimed that Shaikh Ahmad had wronged Hassan al-Bannaa.

So the Shaikh replied with a powerful reply, that needs nothing in addition to it, illustrating the baseless accusations of Ibn Jibreen, and establishing the heresies of Hassan al-Bannaa and his speaking with “wahdat ul-wujood”, and who uttered the Shirk Akbar in the form of poetical compositions, and his praise of the propounders of “wahdat ul-wujood”, and his statement that their is no religious dispute between the Muslims and the Jews, and his taking part in the gatherings at the tombs of Zainab and others, and his witnessing the Major Shirk with his own eyes and not rejecting it, and his travelling 20 miles to the graves of ad-Dasooqee and as-Sinjar and then returning a whole 20 miles, and his efforts to unite between the Sunnis and the Raafidah Shi’ah, and his enacting the bay’ah and calling people to make bay’ah, and to request obedience (that is only given to the wali ul-amr of the Muslims), and his tafweedh of the Attributes of Allaah, the most wicked of all of the sayings of the negators of the Attributes and much more.

The Shaikh finishes by asking Ibn Jibreen 25 questions which he ought to answer, about the so called good effects of Hassan al-Bannaa.

Source:  http://www.salafipublications.com

[Read or Download PDF "Returning a Reply to the one who Requested not to print my book - Shaikh Ahmad bin Yahya An-Najmee" ]

al-Albânî about Qutb’s rhetorical expressions [Video|Ar-En Subtitles]

Scholar: Imâm Muhammad Nâsir-ud-Dîn al-Albânî
Source: alalbany.net/fatawa_view.php?id=6822
Reference: Maktabah Darulhadith.com, Sweden

http://aFatwa.com

Question:

The author of ”Dhilâl-ul-Qur’ân” says in the beginning of his explanation of the chapter Tâ Hâ”:

“The Qur’ân was a phenomenon such as the phenomenon of the heavens and the earth.”

What do you say of this?

Shaykh al-Albânî:

We have several times, O brother, said that Sayyid Qutb (rahimahullâh) was not learned. He was only an author. He did not manage to express himself about Islâmic beliefs and especially the beliefs of Salafiyyah. That is why we should not talk so much about his words since he was not the type of knowledgeable we are talking about, namely in the Qur’ân, Sunnah and the methodology of the Salaf. Many of the times he expresses himself, he does it in a phraseological and rhetorical way. He namely does not express himself in a knowledge-based and Salafî-based way at all.

We do not hesitate in condemning this expression and this comparison [I.e. that the Qur’ân is a phenomenon as the phenomenon of the heavens and the earth]. The best of can say of it is that he means that it really is the speech of Allâh, which is the opinion of Ahl-us-Sunnah wal-Jamâ’ah, or that it is the metaphorical speech of Allâh, which is the opinion of the Mu’tazilah. Thus, it is poetical speech.

I deem that one should not lay any significant stress on this. What one should do is merely show that it is prohibited to speak in this way and that the author’s view of the Qur’ân is unclear; is it the real speech of Allâh or not. This is what I deem.

To compare an-Nawawî and Ibn Hajar with Sayyid Qutb? – Shaykh an-Najmî [Video|Ar-En Subtitles]

Scholar: ´Allâmah Ahmad bin Yahyâ an-Najmî
Reference & source: Darulhadith.com
Translation & video: http://aFatwa.com

Question: If one warns against the books of Sayyid Qutb, some say that even an-Nawawî and Ibn Hajar had errors.

Shaykh an-Najmî:

Is he and Ibn Hajar and an-Nawawi equal? No! These, such as Ibn Hajar and an-Nawawî, belong to AHL-UL-HADÎTH who erred in a certain aspect. They wrongly interpreted the attributes of Allâh.

As for Sayyid Qutb, then what should one say when only ‘Abdullâh ad-Duwaysh has found 181 errors in his Qur’an-interpretation? Plus his errors in “al-’Adâlah al-Ijtimâ’iyyah” and other books.

Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzân – about Sayyid Qutb’s description of the Qur’ân

Related Links:

Shaikh Rabee’ on al-Jarh wa Ta’deel (Criticism and Praise)

The Jihad Of Muhammad Amaan al-Jaami Against Sayyid Qutb And His Blind Followers

May 15, 2012 1 comment

Defense Of Uthman Bin Affaan & Refutation Of Sayyid Qutb & Other Innovators

by

A defense of Uthmaan Bin Affaan (May Allah Be Pleased With Him) and a refutation of those ignorant people who defend Sayyid Qutb but they don’t defend ‘Uthmaan or Mu’awiyyah, Companions of Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon Him)

The Prophet (peace be upon him) Said “Dont Curse My companions if you were to give gold the size of Mount Uhud it would not be equal to a hand full or even half a hand full of what they gave” (Bukhari & Muslim)

Click this link to learn more about the deviations and heresies of Sayyid Qutb:


http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=NDV&subsecID=NDV01&loadpage=dis

Related Links:

A Gift To The Qutbiyyeen From Shaykh Rabee Ibn Hadi al-Madkhali

April 24, 2012 2 comments

Shaikh Al-Albaani on Shaikh Rabee’s Book on Sayyid Qutb’s Mistakes

April 17, 2012 3 comments

Shaikh Al-Albaani on Shaikh Rabee’s Book on Sayyid Qutb’s Mistakes

by The Albaani Blog

Shaikh al-Albaani said about Shaikh Rabee’s book in which he explains the mistakes of Sayyid Qutb,

“Everything that you have refuted Sayyid Qutb with is true and correct, and from that it will become clear to every Muslim reader who has some Islamic heritage that Sayyid Qutb was not acquainted with the fundamentals and subsidiary issues of Islaam.   So may Allaah reward you with the best of rewards, O brother Rabee, for fulfilling the obligation of clarifying and uncovering his ignorance and his deviation from Islaam.”

This book of Shaikh Rabee’s can be downloaded here.

Related Links:

al-Albânî about Qutb, ‘Abdullâh ‘Azzam and al-Ikhwân al-Muslimûn

February 21, 2012 4 comments

Scholar: Imâm Muhammad Nâsir-ud-Dîn al-Albânî
Source: cassette tape ”Mafâhîm yajib an nusahhih”
Reference: Darulhadith, Sweden
www.aFatwa.com

Shaykh al-Albânî: Have you heard about ’Abdullâh ’Azzâm?

A person: Yes!

Shaykh al-Albânî: ‘Abdullâh ‘Azzâm was here with al-Ikhwân al-Muslimûn. Al-Ikhwân al-Muslimûn boycotted me for about seven-eight years ago. They boycotted my lectures and my call and ‘Abdullâh ‘Azzâm was the only one from al-Ikhwân al-Muslimûn who always came to my lectures with a small notebook and a very small pen. Once the decision of boycotting my lectures came, he never appeared again. I once happened to meet him in the Suhayb-mosque outside the prayer. I greeted him and he shamefully greeted back because he didn’t want to break the agreement. I then said to him:

“Is it this what Islâm commands you?”

He then said:

“The summer clouds will soon brighten up.”

The days went by. One day he came home to me but I wasn’t home. He found out that I was at home at (my son in law) Nidhâm, knocked at the door and came in. He thereafter said:

“I went to your home but didn’t find you there. I’m eager to benefit from your knowledge.”

I then said to him:

“That is what I know, but what is the intention with this boycott?”

He then said:

“You have made Takfîr upon Sayyid Qutb!” – and this is the point.

I asked him:

“How?”

He answered:

“You say that he speaks in accordance with Wahdat-ul-Wujûd in the chapter ‘al-Hadîd’ and ‘al-Ikhlâs’.”

I then said:

“Yes, he has uttered some of the utterances of Sûfiyyah. The only thing one could understand from it is that he speaks in accordance with Wahdat-ul-Wujûd. However, according to our principles we do not do Takfîr upon a person who falls into Kufr before he has received the truth. How can you proclaim this boycott when I am in your midst? If you do not come, then you could have sent someone in order to find out if it is true that I am making Takfîr upon Sayyid Qutb or not. Sayyid Qutb says this and that here and there.”

He had an outbreak and said:
“The man believes in Allâh, his messenger and Tawhîd!”

We then said to him:

“O dear brother, we do not refute the truth he said, rather the incorrect.”

Despite this session, he spread two-three articles in the Kuwaiti journal “al-Mujtama’” with big headlines:

“Shaykh al-Albânî makes Takfîr upon Sayyid Qutb.”

This is a long story. The one who says that al-Albânî makes Takfîr is as the one who says that al-Albânî praises Sayyid Qutb at a particular occasion. These people are Ahl-ul-Ahwâ! The only way to cope with them is to pray to Allâh for them.

“Can you then force people to believe?” (The Qur’ân 10:99, interpretation of its meanings)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,617 other followers